On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Wendy Roome <[email protected]>wrote:
> Section 8.5 of draft 14 added: > > For an identifier with the ’priv:’ or ’exp:’ prefix, an additional string > (e.g., company identifier or random string) MUST follow to reduce potential > collisions. For example, a short string after ’exp:’ to indicate the > starting time of a specific experiment is recommended. > > If we're going to require that an extra identifier for cost types, > shouldn't we also require it for endpoint property names (Section 8.6)? > Yes I think we should. I've made a note of this. > > - Wendy Roome > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > >
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
