Hi Haibin, I believe that the format is the following:
- each -00 draft will have 5 min to (optional) present the ideas; - then we will discuss the different branches to identify - 3~5 directions that the group should work first; - the people who will irk on each branch - slide 4 from this last meeting is a good starting place: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-alto-3.pdf - after meeting, those of us who survive will go have an ALTO beer :-) Richard On Tuesday, July 30, 2013, Songhaibin (A) wrote: > One procedure or format question on the side meeting tomorrow. Are we > going to present slides one by one? How can we make some consensus for the > next step plan?**** > > ** ** > > BR,**** > > -Haibin**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> [mailto:[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', '[email protected]');>] > *On Behalf Of *Greg Bernstein > *Sent:* Saturday, July 27, 2013 1:34 AM > *To:* Y. Richard Yang > *Cc:* IETF ALTO > *Subject:* Re: [alto] Draft agenda for Berlin**** > > ** ** > > Sounds great. The meeting time is equivalent to 11:00AM PST so is quite > convenient. > I posted two fairly complete examples of using topology information to my > web site: > (a) Video on Demand example using abstract topology graph: > http://www.grotto-networking.com/VoDExample.html > (b) Data Center backup scheduling using abstract paths with dependencies: > http://www.grotto-networking.com/BackupExample.html > -- The above have some interactive features that utilize JavaScript, so if > ya can't run those see the paper below -- > (c) A paper that summarizes some of our previous work and these > examples:http://www.grotto-networking.com/files/BandwidthConstraintModeling.pdf. > Which relates to Richard's draft. > Cheers > Greg B. > > On 7/26/2013 10:21 AM, Y. Richard Yang wrote:**** > > Hi Greg,**** > > A backup plan is that we use Skype to add remote participants. How does > this sound?**** > > Richard**** > > On Jul 26, 2013 10:12 AM, "Greg Bernstein" <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Is there a way to make this session available for remote participation? > Thanks > Greg B. > On 7/24/2013 1:30 AM, Enrico Marocco wrote:**** > > The request for an additional evening session has been approved. Here**** > > are the details:**** > > ** ** > > Assigned Room: Tegel**** > > Assigned Date: 07/31/2013**** > > Assigned Start Time: 20:00:00**** > > ** ** > > As in Orlando, the plan is to use the time to discuss the five drafts on**** > > the bottom of the agenda in a loosely structured way (i.e. with short**** > > presentations and room discussion with no mic queue, if not practically**** > > required).**** > > ** ** > > If people have additional topics they would like to discuss, please send**** > > a note to the chairs.**** > > ** ** > > Enrico and Vijay**** > > ** ** > > On 7/17/13 11:52 AM, Enrico Marocco wrote:**** > > Hi all,**** > > ** ** > > here's the draft agenda for the upcoming IETF meeting:**** > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/agenda/agenda-87-alto**** > > ** ** > > As we did in Orlando, we'll keep discussions in the Monday session**** > > focused on charter deliverable, and we'll request an additional evening**** > > session (tentatively on Wednesday) for extensive discussion of the**** > > proposed extensions.**** > > ** ** > > If you have sent a request for a slot, please check that it has properly**** > > been accommodated on the agenda.**** > > ** ** > > Enrico and Vijay**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > > > **** > > _______________________________________________**** > > alto mailing list**** > > [email protected]**** > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto**** > > > > > **** > > -- **** > > ===================================================**** > > Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237**** > > ** ** > > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
