On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Wendy, > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Wendy Roome > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Good point! I was relying on the fact that our field names are unique for >> now, but there's no guarantee it will stay that way. So yes, set "field" to >> the full path, and ban "." from field names. >> >> But the path should go all the way to the root dictionary. Eg, for a >> bad mode, >> >> "field": "meta.cost-type.cost-mode" >> "value": "foo" >> > Suppose we want to be consistent with RFC 6901 and RFC 6902, then we may name "field" as "path" and use "/" instead of ".". Any comments? Richard
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
