I tend to agree. But I am okay with either separating or putting two together.
Regards! -Qin 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Y. Richard Yang 发送时间: 2013年11月4日 1:04 收件人: RANDRIAMASY, SABINE (SABINE) 抄送: Qin Wu; IETF ALTO 主题: Re: [alto] FW: I-D Action: draft-wu-alto-te-metrics-00.txt On Saturday, November 2, 2013, RANDRIAMASY, SABINE (SABINE) wrote: Hi Richard and Qin, I agree that even a 10 minutes slot will be focused on the selection and specification of TE based ALTO Costs and on the next steps to this draft. The Cost schedule is a specific Cost Mode that is well suited to TE based metrics that usually change frequently and are a major use case. We may thus point this out as related discussion topic that may continue on the mailing list. Personally, I feel that metric definitions and "schedule" will be better to be defined in different drafts because they are different topics. More generally, I see your "schedule" as a starting point for a powerful API into potentially a large amount of metric data that may be available by a network. The data can be based on both historically collected and/or planned data (e.g., scheduled maintenance). The metrics may or may not change rapidly---many diurnal patterns are slow enough for a slow-path software controller to adapt to. In short, a sense that we are defining a simple but general API in the statistics/prediction domain will be very helpful to move forward. Thanks! Richard Best regards, Sabine De : [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7b%7d,%20'cvml',%20'[email protected]');> [mailto:[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7b%7d,%20'cvml',%20'[email protected]');>] De la part de Qin Wu Envoyé : dimanche 3 novembre 2013 02:14 À : Y. Richard Yang Cc : IETF ALTO Objet : [alto] 答复: I-D Action: draft-wu-alto-te-metrics-00.txt I thought we got 10 min time slot. Sure, we can take offline if out of time. Sabine and I have already had some offline discussion and list discussion on the list when we prepare the slides for this draft. I did agree to add this feature but apparently as an option feature. I am also available before ALTO or after ALTO for discussing this. It will be great we can talk on Sunday. Regards! -Qin 发件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Y. Richard Yang 发送时间: 2013年11月3日 8:39 收件人: Qin Wu 抄送: IETF ALTO 主题: Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-wu-alto-te-metrics-00.txt Hi Qin, Sabine, On Oct 31, 2013 5:48 AM, "Qin Wu" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, Richard, Sabine: > > I think it is a very good idea to discuss schedule of TE metric as open issue > to draft-wu-alto-te-metrics in ALTO session. Given potential extended discussions needed, I am not optimistic that your 5-min slot can accommodate a discussion on introducing schedule. I liked the idea of schedule as I see clear use cases. Google Map goes back and forth with its predicted traffic mode. See this thread http://0-productforums.google.com.library.ccbcmd.edu/forum/m/#!topic/maps/iVaKdxUhuMw< -- -- ===================================== | Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> | | Professor of Computer Science | | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ | =====================================
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
