I also support the adoption of both drafts. -Haibin
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan Seedorf Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 3:34 PM To: Sebastian Kiesel; Enrico Marocco Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [alto] WG adoption of *-3pdisc and *-ip-based-srv-disc drafts I support the adoption of both documents. For the lmap use cases, 3rd party discovery may be necessary, e.g. if a web service provider want to find out which ALTO server can provide LMAP result for a given end user IP address. - Jan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Sebastian Kiesel > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 2:05 PM > To: Enrico Marocco > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [alto] WG adoption of *-3pdisc and *-ip-based-srv-disc > drafts > > Dear all, > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:44:54AM +0200, Enrico Marocco wrote: > > Dear WG participants: > > > > we would like to check consensus on the adoption of the following > > drafts that will complement the server discovery deliverable in the > > current ALTO WG charter: > > > > + draft-kiesel-alto-ip-based-srv-disc > > + draft-kist-alto-3pdisc > > [writing as a co-author of these two drafts] > > Of course I think both drafts are useful and should be adopted, but I > leave the decision up to our valued chairmen whether to consider/count > this statement. :) > > > > [writing as a co-author of RFC 6708 (ALTO requirements)] > > I'd like to bring to your attention that AR-33 (third-party discovery) > is the only requirement we have documented, for which no WG item > specification exists so far. > draft-kist-alto-3pdisc provides a solution for this requirement. > However, if someone knows another (better?) solution, please share it > with us now. > > AR-32 (resource consumer initiated ALTO server discovery) is supported > by draft-ietf-alto-server-discovery-10, which is now in the RFC editor > queue. While this draft is definitely uselful in several important > deployment scenarios, it is not 100% optimal in the light of AR-37. > This is where draft-kiesel-alto-ip-based-srv-disc fits in. > > Thanks > Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
