Hi Wendy,
vtag is self-tag, and hence should a scalar. We will fix the typo in the
example right away.
Thanks a lot!
Richard
On Monday, December 2, 2013, Wendy Roome wrote:
> Question: Is the "vtag" field in "meta" supposed to be just one tag? Or is
> supposed to be an array? I thought we'd said "vtag" defined the one and
> only version tag for this resource, and hence it made no sense for a
> resource to have more than one vtag. So "vtag" should be a simple
> dictionary.
>
> "dependent-vtags", on the other hand, is an array of vtags, even though
> all current examples just have one element.
>
> {11.1} is the only place that describes those fields. It definitely says
> that "dependent-vtags" is an array. But it's not as explicit about "vtag".
>
> In any case, the examples in {11.2.1.7} and {11.3.1.7} present "vtag" as
> an array. Eg,
>
> "meta" : {
> "vtag":
> [
> { "resource-id": "my-default-network-map", "tag": "1266506139" }
> ]
> },
>
>
>
> Is that correct?? Or should "vtag" really be a simple dictionary, as in
>
> "meta" : {
> "vtag":
> { "resource-id": "my-default-network-map", "tag": "1266506139" }
> },
>
> ???
>
>
> - Wendy Roome
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
--
--
=====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]> |
| Professor of Computer Science |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ |
=====================================
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
