Hi all,

Given this discussion, should the slides assume that the extension proposals  
related to work items already draw interest and thus mainly contain examples 
formats illustrating how --- simply --- these extensions can be expressed in 
the IRD capabilities, the ALTO request  and response, plus a list of possible 
format options?

Thanks,
Sabine

De : alto [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Leeyoung
Envoyé : mardi 18 février 2014 16:43
À : Y. Richard Yang; Gurbani, Vijay K (Vijay)
Cc : alto
Objet : Re: [alto] ALTO agenda for London IETF

I fully support Richard's idea.

Young

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 4:00 PM
To: Vijay K. Gurbani
Cc: Leeyoung; alto
Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO agenda for London IETF

As much as I would like to see the graph representation (using the new terms 
that Greg, Wendy, and I are recently using, Path Vector and/or Graph 
representation), starting with a survey is a quite reasonable idea. But I hope 
that it is not limited to only an informational survey, and a couple slides 
showing what the format might look like can be helpful.

Richard
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 02/17/2014 02:39 PM, Leeyoung wrote:
Hi Vijay,

I read your agenda page you just published. I read the following as one of the 
agenda:

(Informational) A survey of techniques to formalize the structure
    of a network graph (that can derived from a set of related ALTO
    network and cost maps) in a format that would facilitate advanced
    graph computation.  Such survey will cover both models used in
    popular open-source software (e.g. NetworkX, Blueprints) and models
    being considered in other working groups (e.g. netmod, i2rs). (18')

Have the WG already decided this item to be just informational not on standard 
track?
I thought the mailing discussions in the last few weeks show that there are
Sufficient interests and willingness to work on this item.

Young: The interest and willingness to work is precisely why it is on
the list of work items!  Whether this turns out to be Informational,
Standards track or Experimental is yet to be determined; the track on
the agenda is merely where discussions start.

Clearly, the discussion we had on the list lead to an understanding
that this is a sufficiently complex topic that any pithy attempt to
characterize it merely for the sake of "doing something" will not be
valued as much as a reasoned attempt to catalogue what is missing from
the current models to represent graphs.  Once we have such a
distinction, it becomes relatively easy to figure out how to close
the gap.

Should we blithely put a deliverable of "Graph representation and
dynamic graph transformation techniques", I suspect that there will be
some push back from the IESG on exactly what this means, considering
that even among us there is some trepidation that we should do the
easy part (graph representation) first before tackling the hard
part (graph transformation).  Remember, the charter is produced by
the BoF/WG but has to be accepted by the IESG.  As such, taking a
nuanced approach by understanding the missing pieces first appears to
make sense, no?

We will discuss this some more during London, of course.

Cheers,


- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com<http://bell-labs.com>,acm.org<http://acm.org>} / 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto



--
--
 =====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>   |
| Professor of Computer Science       |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |
 =====================================
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to