Hi Spencer, Good call to run this past the WG. The ALTO-related text came from Richard (he is listed as a Contributor) and was slightly re-worked by Dan and me. Cheers, Adrian From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 20 January 2015 00:09 To: [email protected] Cc: Y. Richard Yang; IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] Some help wrt ALTO and draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture-07.txt Dear ALTOs, On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: Hi again Richard, We are in no rush. It is better to have some considered and structured text in March than hurried text later today. It will be interesting to debate the formation of the TED and LSP-DB using ALTO. I believe this discussion starts to overlap with your potential rechartering and needs to be resolved through a discussion with the Routing Area. that does not mean: - ALTO is the wrong protocol for this - we should not discuss it in this document We do, however, have to draw a careful line between what can be done and what could be done. Looking forward to seeing text. Cheers, Adrian I don't know that I ever saw actual text sent in response to Adrian's request for help on this, which wouldn't be surprising if the conversation went off list, but I wanted to make sure you folks knew the draft is on this week's telechat agenda, and mentions ALTO in a number of places. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture-15 I don't see anything that seems wrong to me, but you guys are the experts on this, so if you see anything i should know about before the telechat Thursday, especially if it would change my No Objection ballot, please respond Real Soon Now. Thanks, Spencer, as one of the balloting ADs
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
