On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Wendy Roome <[email protected]> wrote:
> I already have a start for compliance tests -- see > http://alto.alcatel-lucent.com:8000/validate-server > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__alto.alcatel-2Dlucent.com-3A8000_validate-2Dserver&d=AwMFAg&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=4G36iiEVb2m_v-0RnP2gx9KZJjYQgfvrOCE3789JGIA&m=2gSz8abdwCKA46ZzfuuqmROwpNENiQclUBd8YSzYsJY&s=5xb-YmFczOwf1JBuCV_hT51YMEzXdzHFdg2owONrrBY&e=> > and > http://alto.alcatel-lucent.com:8000/validate-msg > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__alto.alcatel-2Dlucent.com-3A8000_validate-2Dmsg&d=AwMFAg&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=4G36iiEVb2m_v-0RnP2gx9KZJjYQgfvrOCE3789JGIA&m=2gSz8abdwCKA46ZzfuuqmROwpNENiQclUBd8YSzYsJY&s=ZdWHyChFBK081zYck6jCEnHphdbxSmYDcCNcLdYPfJE&e=> > . > > Super cool! > But I have not seen IETF compliance tests for other protocols. Does the > IETF officially sponsor/endorse them? Or must they be done outside of the > IETF? > > I guess this is a question that the chairs/AD can provide the guidance :-) Richard > - Wendy Roome > > From: "Y. Richard Yang" <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:40 > To: Wendy Roome <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]" < > [email protected]>, Hans Seidel <[email protected]>, " > [email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [alto] Interop test > > 2. A second comment is that it will be interesting if the interop design > will also become a starting point of ALTO compliance tests. We partition > the tests into MUST and optional so that a test case is a MUST case if and > only if (iff) it is a MUST in RFC7285. In the current proposal below, I see > some mix (e.g., some services in the interop is not a MUST in RFC7285). > Make sense? >
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
