[email protected] writes:
Question for you all -- and especially for our chairpeople: are you
interested in upgrading this to a WG document, with the intent of turning
it into an RFC. In other words, would you like to turn this into an
official test suite for ALTO, rather than being a one-shot deal for
IETF-93? For the seasoned IETFers, does the IETF allow such test suite?
Wendy, all: my advice to you would be to continue moving the document
ahead, irrespective of whether or not it is upgraded to a WG document.
There are other streams by which an I-D can be made into an RFC. In my
opinion, the biggest input to the process of a WG moving work ahead to
RFC status is whether or not the draft is valuable to the WG members.
Clearly it appears that the interoperability document meets that
bar, so I would advise you to continue moving the work ahead. We (i.e.,
the chairs and AD) will get it on some stream towards an RFC so your
efforts are not wasted.
Cheers,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
