Wendy,

I can look it over, say next Monday.  Meanwhile, it's better to have
someone else take a look too.  Maybe Hans and Jensensince they have
reviewed the draft before?

Regards,
Kai

On 24/03/16 21:05, Wendy Roome wrote:
> Kai,
>
> It never occurred to me that someone might send an ADD & REMOVE for
> the same id in the same control message. I’ll make it clear that is
> illegal.
>
> I’ll try to revise the draft by Friday. Would you or anyone else like
> to look it over before I officially post it as a new version?
>
> - Wendy
>
> From: EXT Gao Kai <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Wed, March 23, 2016 at 23:04
> To: Wendy Roome <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [alto] State of the WG
>
> Wendy,
>
> 1. That makes perfect sense and thanks for the clarification.
>
> 2. Maybe it's just my paranoia but I feel worried about "what if
> someone squash ADD/REMOVE for the same request-id in one request". 
> May I suggest that we add a statement that this behaviour is undefined
> and must be avoided?
>
> Sorry for my obsession with these details...Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> On 23/03/16 02:10, Wendy Roome wrote:
>> Kai,
>>
>> 1. The Create-Stream request must be POST, not GET. The ALTO server
>> doesn’t care, but the HTTP protocol allows proxies to cache GET
>> requests. Proxies are not supposed to cache POST requests.
>>
>> 2. The control commands I defined don’t really interact with each
>> other, so I don’t think we need to define a processing order, other
>> than to say that the server should not close the stream unless there
>> are no resources left after all commands have been processed. Oh yes,
>> SHUTDOWN should be the only command in a request; there is no point
>> in combining SHUTDOWN with anything else.
>>
>> Does everyone like this alternative? If so, I will update the draft.
>>
>> - Wendy
>>

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to