On 04/07/2016 04:19 AM, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) wrote:
Vijay,
You could perhaps note that relevant parts of the document are backed
by implementations and/or experiments.
For instance, for section 3.2 (and Section 6.1) an implementation has
been reported to the
WG:https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg02202.html
(the link now seems to
behttp://www.ewsdn.eu/files/Presentations/EWSDN%202013/2_3_Dynamic_VPN_optimization.pdf)
More details can be found in: [...]
Michael: Reports of implementation and experiments are absolutely
crucial in the proto-writeup of a document that standardizes a
protocol (a la rfc7285, the ALTO protocol RFC). In our case here, we
are not standardizing ALTO as much as we are documenting the state
of acceptance, use, and deployment of ALTO in current networks.
All that said, documents --- even Informational-track ones --- do not
exist in a vacuum, and you have rightly pointed out relevant
publications do exist. As such, I do agree with you and will put
in the references you suggested in the final proto-writeup.
Thanks for collecting the references.
Cheers,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
