Hi Ekr,

I think the threat below can easily mitigated by not using multi-query because 
that’s a client side decisions. It’s probably good to anyway document the risk 
described below so clients are aware of it and can make an informed decision to 
use multi-query or not. Can you maybe proposed 2-3 sentences to be added to 
address your discuss?

Thanks,
Mirja


> Am 12.04.2017 um 01:02 schrieb Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>:
> 
> Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This document states:
> "This document does not introduce any privacy or security issues not
>   already present in the ALTO protocol."
> 
> This may be true, but it's not obvious it is, because when questions are
> asked together, that's more of a privacy signature than independently.
> So, suppose that application A asks for metric A and application B asks
> for metric B and application C asks for A and B. If these applications
> are mixed behind a CGN, with single queries then you don't know whether
> you have some A clients and some B clients, but if you do multi-query,
> it's clear these are C clients. This is a potentially serious issue if
> (for instance) Bittorrent always asks for a very distinguished set of
> parameters, so an ALTO server might use this to find Bittorrent clients.
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to