Thanks!

> Am 09.05.2017 um 00:39 schrieb Martin Thomson <[email protected]>:
> 
> Yes, I believe that the changes made were sufficient.
> 
> On 8 May 2017 at 22:15, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>> 
>> just to double check: do you think this document is ready now and all your 
>> comments have been addressed?
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 27.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) 
>>> <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> Hello Martin,
>>> 
>>> I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been 
>>> moved in a section 1.1.
>>> As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence
>>> "When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is 
>>> used."
>>> 
>>> The update and status are available at 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sabine
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39
>>>>> To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-
>>>>> bell-labs.com>
>>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-alto-multi-
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords.
>>>>>> [SR     ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" 
>>>>>> and
>>>>> section "9.1.  Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the 
>>>>> boilerplate.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to