Dear authors, I think it’s quit useful to provide cost calendar for the users. Here’s my review of this draft.
1. One concern is that the query result of Cost Calendar is not only related to regular data changes, but also can be affected by some unexpected topology changes, say link failures. So some cost in Cost Calendar can be abnormal and may mislead the user to do the inappropriate choice. 2. In the current design, the ALTO client only chooses if it needs the calendar. Is it possible that the ALTO server has several options of different combinations of “time-interval-size” and “number-of intervals” for ALTO client to choose for more fine-grained Cost Calendars? Other detailed modification: In the 3rd paragraph of section 2.2, “A calendar and its capabilities are associated to a given information resource” - associated to -> associated with In the 1st paragraph of section 3, “A calendar is associated to an information resource rather than a cost type.” - associated to -> associated with In the 1st paragraph of section 3.1, ”by an object of type 'CalendarAttributes', associated to this Cost Type and specified below.” - associated to -> associated with In the 3rd paragraph of section 3.1, ”on this "cost-type-name" for this ressource entry.” - ressource -> resource In the 1st paragraph of section 4.1.3, ”as specified in the IRD to shedule its bulk data transfers as described in the use cases.” - shedule -> schedule In section 4.2.2, “include the same addifional member "calendar-response-attributes" as …” - addifional ->additional In the 1st paragraph of section 4.2.3, “Let us assume an Application Client is located in an end sytem with limited resources and …” - sytem -> system In the 2nd paragraph of section 4.2.3, “the 'routingcost' is assumed to be time sentitive with values provided as ALTO Calendars.” - sentitive -> sensitive In the 3rd paragraph of section 4.2.3, "The ALTO Client associated to the Application Client …” - associated to -> associated with In the 4th paragraph of section 4.2.3, “the sollicited ALTO Server has …” - sollicited -> solicited In the 2nd paragraph of section 4.3, “An ALTO Server aquiring cost values in limited time intervals …” - aquiring -> acquiring In the 6th paragraph of section 5.1, “a small topology with low density and low capacity that carries inpredictable” - inpredictable -> unpredictable In the 3rd paragraph of section 5.2, “the interaction with Endpoints can be orchestratrated and scheduled at the time slots …” - orchestratrated -> orchestrated The subtitle of section 6.2, “Information for IANA on proposed Endpoint Propeeries” - Propeeries -> Properties Best wishes, Eason _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
