Hi Richard, On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:47:06AM +0200, Y. Richard Yang wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Indeed. Most comments are editorial as your draft is very well written > already. The main issues which may become non-editorial are (1) whether to > make the demarcation points flexible; (2) some more discussions on the > mapping between prefix and information mapping. I will be more than happy > to send a few more sentences right after this ietf.
Looking forward to see a text proposal! Regarding (1): our goal was to have a simple and well-defined algorithm which causes as few as possible load on the DNS - the demarcation points are following the usual prefix lengths that registries delegate. > Regarding the 64 bits example. What if the prefix is say 65 bits. It looks > that the nested if will skip it. Do I misunderstand? Well, a prefix length of /65 should not occur with "regular" IPv6 unicast ... Do we need to open tha can of worms about IPv4 addresses encoded as v6 addresses etc.? Thanks, Sebastian _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
