Dawn: Excellent. Thanks a lot. Jensen has also volunteered to look at S6 and S7.
As soon as you post your reviews of these sections by Wed, we'll move the work ahead, subject to what you find in your review, of course. Cheers, On 07/03/2018 10:33 AM, Dawn Chan wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > I can do a review of S6 and S7 too. > > Dawn > > > ________________________________________ > From: Jensen Zhang <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 10:55:18 AM > To: Vijay K. Gurbani > Cc: [email protected]; Chan Dawn; Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - > FR/Paris-Saclay); [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-06.txt > > Hi Vijay, > > I will give a review on S6 and S7 by Wednesday. > > Best, > Jensen > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 6:26 AM Vijay K. Gurbani > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Sabine: Thank you for getting this out. I was hoping that all nits > identified by IDNits tool will be taken care in this revision. > Unfortunately, IDNits reports three warnings for -06. These need to be > eventually fixed, perhaps as part of Auth-48, etc. > > But before I can send the draft to IESG, I need key members of the WG > who have reviewed previous versions of this draft to review the newly > added Security Considerations section. You only need to review this > section, as previous versions of the draft were reviewed in their > entirety. The new addition here is S6 (Security Considerations) and S7 > (Operations Considerations). > > Can I please request a subset of the following people to review S6 and S7: > > Yichen Qian, Li Geng, Dawn Chen, and Jensen Zhang > > I will like at least two people from the above set to read S6 and S7 and > let the WG know whether the draft is ready to be moved out of the WG. > > Please do so soon, preferably by Wed midnight (US Eastern). The > sections are short, but your reading and feedback to the WG will be > invaluable. > > Thank you, > > On 07/02/2018 10:23 AM, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In this version 06: >> >> - Section 6 Security Considerations has been revised for a more complete >> threat model, >> - A new Section 7 "Operations Considerations" has been added and now >> contains the initial text on Security Considerations of version >> draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-05. >> >> Thanks, >> Sabine >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: alto [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On >> Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 5:09 PM >> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> Subject: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-06.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization WG >> of the IETF. >> >> Title : ALTO Cost Calendar >> Authors : Sabine Randriamasy >> Richard Yang >> Qin Wu >> Lingli Deng >> Nico Schwan >> Filename : draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-06.txt >> Pages : 27 >> Date : 2018-07-02 >> >> Abstract: >> The goal of Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) is to >> bridge the gap between network and applications by provisioning >> network related information in order to allow applications to make >> network informed decisions. The present draft extends the ALTO cost >> information so as to broaden the decision possibilities of >> applications to not only decide 'where' to connect to, but also >> 'when'. This is useful to applications that need to schedule their >> data transfers and connections and have a degree of freedom to do so. >> ALTO guidance to schedule application traffic can also efficiently >> help for load balancing and resources efficiency. Besides, the ALTO >> Cost Calendar allows to schedule the ALTO requests themselves and >> thus to save a number of ALTO transactions. >> >> This draft proposes new capabilities and attributes on filtered cost >> maps and endpoint cost maps enabling an ALTO Server to provide "Cost >> Calendars". These capabilities are applicable to ALTO metrics with >> time-varying values. With ALTO Cost Calendars, an ALTO Server >> exposes ALTO cost values in JSON arrays where each value corresponds >> to a given time interval. The time intervals as well as other >> Calendar attributes are specified in the IRD and ALTO Server >> responses. >> >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-06 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-06 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-06 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> alto mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> >> _______________________________________________ >> alto mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani / [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Network Data Science, Nokia Networks > Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq > - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani / [email protected] Network Data Science, Nokia Networks Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
