Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Section 4.2.3. and 4.2.4. This document uses addresses from the allocatable global unicast IPv6 space in 2000::/3 in the examples. Please use addresses from the 2001:db8::/32 documentation prefix instead for the examples as per RFC6890. * Section 6 Any reason this document requires the use of TLS 1.2 instead of TLS 1.3? _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
