Vijay, can you update the shepherd write up and re-run the wg last call with a
note to the working group that this IPR exists?
As co-chair I agree: we need to inform the WG and re-do a WG last call,
giving people the chance to comment if they think necessary
Sabine, maybe you can also address the other comments from the IESG in a new
revision before we re-start WG last call, especially the use of examples IP
addresses as flagged by Suresh and Adam, and use of https as flagged by Alissa
and Adam. I think Ben’s discuss needs further discussion before we can update.
Please reply to his email as well as soon as possible!
That is a good idea; Sabine, what do you think?
- Jan
On 06.12.18 19:53, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
Hi Sabine,
thanks for confirming this. I have set the „replaces“ field in the datatracker
now correctly and the IPR shows up respectively.
Vijay, can you update the shepherd write up and re-run the wg last call with a
note to the working group that this IPR exists?
Sabine, maybe you can also address the other comments from the IESG in a new
revision before we re-start WG last call, especially the use of examples IP
addresses as flagged by Suresh and Adam, and use of https as flagged by Alissa
and Adam. I think Ben’s discuss needs further discussion before we can update.
Please reply to his email as well as soon as possible!
Thanks!
Mirja
Am 06.12.2018 um 19:31 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
<[email protected]>:
Hello,
I confirm that the IPR attached to draft-randriamasy-alto-cost-calendar still applies to draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar.
I also attach the IPR declaration that I sent on June 7th
Please let me know what I can do to help resolving this issue.
Sabine
From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2018 4:14 PM
To: Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; The IESG
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US/Naperville)
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [alto] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on
draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with DISCUSS)
Perfect!
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On December 6, 2018 at 8:53:38 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) ([email protected]) wrote:
I will check with authors and chairs, however it could also be the cause that
the IPR was not applicable to the wg doc anymore, as there have been quite some
changes to the -01 version of the draft (when the IPR was filed) and the
adopted version.
If that is not the case, we will re-issue wg and IETF last call and bring it
back.
<Mail-Anhang.eml>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
