On 1/30/19 4:26 PM, Vijay Gurbani wrote:
Do I get the sense that the WG thinks that this is the best course of action? (I must apologize as I am coming up to speed on this issue. If I was to produce a 1 sentence summary of the issue here, it is that RFC 8259 normatively requires UTF-8 encoding and that there are existing ALTO implementations conformant to RFC 7285 that use encodings other than UTF-8. Is that accurate?).
That's my understanding, modulo any other JSON changes you might want to highlight. Again, I think RFC 7647 provides a good example of how this kind of thing can be clarified.
/a _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
