Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work on this document. I strongly agree with Suresh’s first point, regarding the restatement of the merge algorithm. I have one additional comment: Section 3.1.2.1: "ipv4" : [ "192.0.2.0/24", "198.51.100.0/25", "193.51.100.0/25" ], The address "193.51.100.0" is from a block allocated to the University of Paris. Please change it to an RFC 5737 documentation address. (This occurs twice in the document) _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
