Dear all,
please find below the minutes from the ALTO session at IETF-108 which I
just uploaded to the datatracker. Please let us know any comments or
corrections you might have.
A big thanks to Qiao and Sabine for taking the notes!
- Jan & Vijay
****
----- AGENDA & MATERIAL -------------------------------------------
IETF 108, Virtual Meeting
ALTO WG, Mon Jul 27, 2020 14:10 - 15:50
14:10 - 14:15 5" Chair slides
14:16 - 14:26 10" Unified Properties, Sabine Randriamasy [1]
14:27 - 14:35 8" Performance metrics, Richard Yang [2]
14:36 - 14:41 5" CDNI, Jensen Zhang [3]
14:42 - 14:52 10" Path vector, Kai Gao [4]
14:53 - 15:50 57" Recharter discussion
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-12
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics/
[3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-12
[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-path-vector/
Slides
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/session/alto
----- ATTENDANCE: 40-43 people -------------------------------------------
Bluesheet:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/bluesheets/bluesheets-108-alto-202007271410-00.txt
WG Chairs: Vijay Gurbani, Jan Seedorf
Area Director: Martin Duke
Minute takers: Sabine Randriamasy, Qiao Xiang
----- ACRONYMS AND NAMES USED IN THE MINUTES
-------------------------------------------
CX Chunshan Xiong
DL Danny Lachos
JS Jan Seedorf
JZ Jensen Zhang
KG Kai Gao
MD Martin Duke
RY Richard Yang
SR Sabine Randriamasy
VG Vijay Gurbani
APM ALTO Performance Cost Metrics (WG draft)
CDNI Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing:
CDNI
Footprint and Capabilities Advertisement using
ALTO (WG draft)
PV Path Vector (WG draft)
UP Unified Properties for the ALTO protocol (WG draft)
EG e.g.
----- MINUTES -------------------------------------------
----- 0. Chair slides
Overall document status: cost calendar and SSE are in RFC editor. CDNI
has passed WGLC. Unified properties is in WGLC.
The focus of the WG is to finalize the charter items. Right now things
are going well. unified properties is in WGLC, and the chairs things
path vector and performance metrics are also ready for entering WGLC.
However, due to their dependency on unified properties, the chairs and
the AD decide to hold them from WGLC until unified properties passes WGLC.
In addition, this meeting will also discuss rechartering. The chairs are
happy to see the discussion and energy on the mailing list for
rechartering items.
VG on the ALTO rechartering disc kick-off. The goal is to get a sense,
as meant in RFC2418, (see slide 7: does charter address relevant issues
for the Internet community? Are goals specific and achievable (in
reasonable time) ? Does the WG have the expertise ? ) Goal is not to
take a re-charter decision during IETF 108 but open the discussion. The
proposed stuff should be achievable. So expertise and energy is needed in WG
----- 1. Unified Properties:
Sabine introduces the key design update and text update in the draft. In
particular, the definition of "defining information resource" is
introduced. The draft is in WGLC until August 7.
Vijay: the draft is fairly mature.
Jan: people are encouraged to read the document and if there is any
question, please send to auhors. SR adds 2 other drafts depend on UP so
UP needs to be clear.
----- 2. Performance Metrics:
Richard introduces the key design updates from v10 to v12 to address key
comments from 107 meeting: (1) how to choose types of metrics => ALTO
provides guidance, not measurement framework, and 4 types of guidance
are chosen; (2) how to conform to rfc6390 => define metrics in the
document by defining metric name, metric description, units of
measurment and measurement points, and provide context information for
coarse-grained information such as routing system information; (3) how
to handle different statistics => provide complete statistic by adding
stddev and stdvar and (4) how to convey freshness => use HTTP Last-Modified.
Vijay: after the minor edits suggested by the authors, this document is
ready for WGLC after UP.
----- 3. CDNI:
Jensen presents the key changes from v11 to v12: (1) generalize media
types and attribute names to make FCI a special case, and (2) update
sections related to unified properties, such as representing footprint
objects as property map entities and representing CDNI capabilities as
property map entity properties.
Vijay: this document also depends on unified properties.
No questions so this draft will move ahead.
----- 4. Path vector:
Kai presents the updates and status of this draft. This draft is waiting
to start WGLC, depending on unified properties. Key updates in v11
includes text updates on the motivation example of flow scheduling, the
discussion on ephemeral ANE and persistent ANE, and to be in sync with
the unified properties draft. The presented design updates now support
non-ephemeral ANEs, as it was the case before, and extend the
application scope initially restricted to flow scheduling, to paths
including persistent ANEs.
Vijay: PV is a major deliverable of the first recharter, and should
start WGLC after or in parallel (TBD) with unified properties. If it is
ready, the chairs will issue a WGLC.
----- Recharter discussion:
- Slides: Overview
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-alto-alto-re-charter-overview-00
Richard presents the recharter overview slides. The current ALTO
high-level goals is to provide network information to application in an
abstraction that simplify complex network information. Its bigger
context is network-application integration. The current ALTO framework
and its deployment is reviewed.
Following the guidances of AD (Martin), i.e., relevance, review and
feasibility, the discussion on recharter is organised based on use cases
(cellular, mEC, huge data, automation, interdomain, ALTO extension) and
structure (abstractions, transport services, backend and
server-to-server). A total of 16 1-page presentations are prepared, but
only 7 are presented due to the time.
- Slides: 1Slider for proposed extensions
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-alto-one-slide-alto-extensions-for-recharter-discussion-03
The 7 presented ones are:
(1) (Tencent and China Mobile) MoWIE: network information exposure
framework for cellular networks (e.g., ABR for cloud gaming, video QoE
prediction, and TCP perform optimization);
(2) (Telefonica) Using ALTO to determine service edge;
(3) (T-Mobile) ETSI ZSM use case
(4) (Tsinghua U and Shenzhen U): Deliver functions to edge over ALTO;
Richard comments that CDNI is a good starting point for this item.
(5) (ESNet, Caltech, CERN): ALTO extensions for flexible resource
information and interaction models are needed to support huge data in
the SENSE project;
(6) (Telefonica) ALTO extension to support BGP communities
(7) (UNICAMP) Multidomain ALTO services
(12) (Tencent / China Mobile) In-band and out-of-band network
information exposure
(16) (T-Mobile) ALTO automation extension
The 9 unpresented ones are:
(8) (Tongji U/Sichuan U) Predictive throughput for TCP reactive flows
(9) (Tongji U) Flow-based network information query
(10) (Nokia) ALTO services extension supporting cost context
(11) (Yale) Generic query language extension for ALTO
(13) (Yale) ALTO transport extension supporting HTTP/2
(14) (Tongji U) ALTO transport extension with multipart
(15) (Telefonica) Automatic derivation of ALTO information from southbound
--- Discussion:
Vijay: generic query extension seems interesting.
Andre Bondi (chat channel): I think it would be useful to describe how
metrics tie back to use cases and how they inform us about network usage
and use case impact.
Vijay said we should open-up the floor to other ideas. Future meeting
should be purely on re chartering.
Martin Duke objected that we cannot take 16 drafts as milestones.
Vijay/Jan/Martin agree on limiting to 3-5 re-chartering items.
Vijay/Jan: Instead of waiting for next IETF, we need an interim meeting
to tie down 3-5 deliverables?
Lyle Bertz: Is this correct? 1. narrow down work (combine by themes) 2.
try to recharter prior to the next IETF meeting.
Martin: The next deliverable is a draft charter, which requires some
downsize select and consensus gathering.
Vijay and other attendants agree an interim meeting would be helpful.
****
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
