Hi Vijay, I can also provide another review for performance-metrics. I see there have been already two reviewers. Do we still need one more?
Thanks, Jensen On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:53 PM Vijay Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Danny: Excellent, and thank you for your time on this. > > We still need one more reviewer for performance-metrics and two for > path-vector. > > All: Please step up. > > Thank you. > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:32 AM Danny Alex Lachos Perez < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Jan & Vijay >> >> I will review the Performance Metrics document. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Danny Lachos >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jan Seedorf <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward >>> with all the remaining milestones. >>> >>> Thus, this email starts a WGLC for >>> draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, so >>> from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. >>> >>> We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part of >>> the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the draft as >>> part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. >>> >>> - Vijay and Jan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> alto mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> alto mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
