Dear Kai: Happy new year.

I am in the process of doing a chair review of path-vector and
unified-props.  My suggestion is that the nits can be addressed after I
post my chair review on the mailing list.
I am reviewing unified-props this week, so I will get to path-vector next
week.
Thanks,
- vijay

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:39 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi Vijay,
>
>
> How do you do? We have fixed most of the IDNits errors/warnings with a new
> revision -14. The remaining warnings are:
>
>
> 1. IDNits identifes [TBD] as references but we are using them in examples
> as placeholders for content length values.
>
> 2. IDNits thinks the version of
> [I-D.yang-alto-deliver-functions-over-networks] is -00 but the latest
> version as we used in the draft is -01.
>
>
> How do you suggest we proceed here? Do you think we can submit -14 right
> now? Or we should wait for your review on -13?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Best,
>
> Kai
>
>
> -----Original Messages-----
> *From:*[email protected]
> *Sent Time:*2021-01-12 17:46:53 (Tuesday)
> *To:* "Qin Wu" <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* "IETF ALTO" <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [alto] Shepherd writeup for path-vector (draft)
>
> Hi Qin,
>
>
> Thanks for the notification! I will fix the IDNits errors as soon as possible.
>
> Best,
> Kai
>
> 2021-01-12 09:45:08"Qin Wu" <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> Hi, authors of path-vector:
>
> I haven’t seen you addressed IDnits errors raised by Vijay below:
>
>
> https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-13.txt
>
> Please reply to Vijay and confirm whether there are anything missing or
> open issues which haven’t been closed.
>
>
>
> -Qin (With chair hat on)
>
> *发件人:* alto [mailto:[email protected]] *代表 *Vijay Gurbani
> *发送时间:* 2020年12月2日 1:36
> *收件人:* IETF ALTO <[email protected]>
> *主题:* [alto] Shepherd writeup for path-vector (draft)
>
>
>
> All: I have started the shepherd review of path-vector  The review is
> below.
>
> The token is with me to do a chair/shepherd review of the draft.  With the
> semester coming to a close and grading to do, etc., I have reserved the
> week starting Dec-16 to do the shepherd review of the draft.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, please go through the draft shepherd writeup and let me
> know if I have erred anywhere.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> - vijay
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-13
>
> 1. Summary.
>
> The document shepherd is Vijay K. Gurbani, and the responsible area
> director is Martin Duke.
>
> The document is a Standards Track document, targeted as a Proposed
> Standard.  The WG has chosen the requested publication type since this
> draft extends the base ALTO protocol in a normative manner.  Specifically,
> the document seeks to extend the base ALTO protocol (RFC 7285) to provide
> the concept of "Abstract Network Elements" (ANE).  ANEs are an abstraction
> of physical network components --- routers, etc. --- that handle (switch)
> packets.  An application whose performance may be impacted by a particular
> traversal path in the network may wish to consult the ANEs to determine an
> optimized path to the destination.
>
> This draft is a major conceptual advance in the abstractions provided by
> the base ALTO protocol.
>
> 2. Review and consensus.
> This work is mature.  It started off as an individual submission in March
> 2015, and was adopted as a WG deliverable in May 2017.  A detailed review
> of this draft was provided early on by Sabine Randriamasy [1,2,3] shortly
> after it was adopted.  Version -04 was further reviewed by Danny Perez [4]
> and Qiao Xiang [5] in 2018, and the work progressed appreciably between
> 2018 and 2019, resulting in the release of -09 in November 2019.
>
> A WGLC was initiated on Sep-28-2020, and a review was provided by Qiao
> Xiang [6] and Luis Contreras [7] on version -11.  Version -12 included the
> comments from Qiao and Luis, with version -13 following with some minor
> revisions.
>
> Earlier versions of path-vector have been implemented (without the
> integration of unified-props); the implementation was used in a super
> computing conference demonstration for OpenFlow-based networks [8].  The
> latest version of path-vector is being implemented and will be open-sourced
> on GitHub [9].
>
> The shepherd has an action item to review version -13.
>
> 3. Intellectual property
> All of the authors have confirmed with the shephered that they are not
> aware of any IPR filed with respect to the draft.
>
> 4. Other points
> IDNits reports 1 error, 7 warnings, and 2 comments.
>
> [1]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/IQ0WwgWewFKJkvzZSIQRhkiN-hc/
> [2]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/4wa_kXE4GUrigZ33TBCVVuwBuiw/
> [3]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/GGroJgfL5XGuH1ydWOLmISCPMKY/
> [4]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/HSGkZ2o4JvneiiYiVSGcCZjDVSQ/
> [5]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/qnIBXzFEiYxMDm9kvHLH53qbn_Y/
> [6]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/uwFNjekGcc3zMdSKleHU7eIdsW4/
> [7]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/D5jkRGws2c75paw6yP8_5_40ViY/
> [8] https://github.com/openalto/mercator-setup
> [9] https://github.com/openalto/sextant
>
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to