Hi Christian, Thanks for the update. Can you please take a look at the responses to your review in the previous email to see if they are addressing the two issues below?
Richard On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:14 AM Christian Amsüss <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:02:08AM -0700, Christian Amsüss via Datatracker > wrote: > > ## Summary for the IoT Directorate > > I performed the review with the wrong hat on, sorry for the mixup. > > > Refocusing on the ART review criteria brings up nothing new -- but the > point about the formal language used with metric-identifier deserves > more emphasis. > > Likewise, the point about registration of the stat-typed metric > identifiers (and the possible structuring of the registry into > registered prefixes and per-prefix semantics for what is behind a colon) > now falls more directly into the scope of the review. > > Otherwise, what was said with focus on the IoT applies likewise to the > use of HTTP and other general ART topics: > > > As for conventions around the Internet of Things, this makes no choices > -- if > > follows the path set out by ALTO, and adds terms and considerations for > metrics > > established outside of ALTO. > > Best regards > Christian > > -- > To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater > powers. > -- Bene Gesserit axiom > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > -- -- ===================================== | Y. Richard Yang <[email protected]> | | Professor of Computer Science | | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ | =====================================
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
