Thanks Martin for bringing up this work for attention, I think the current status of this work has passed through IRSG review and is now ready for IESG conflict review, To all WG members, this is our last chance to revisit this draft and look for alignment with what we have already done.
For some relevant discussion, please take a look at this thread: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/vHxu_j9exs1_K9dSUsMpBOgC3HE/ -Qin (on behalf of chairs) BTW: we briefly discussed the collaboration with PANRG on Tuesday ALTO weekly meeting. Actually we have engaged with PANRG WG members in IETF 112 to discuss how to align draft-irtf-panrg-path-properties with ALTO path vector and Unified property drafts and will provide another round review on this draft in couple of weeks and cross post to both ALTO and PANRG list. 发件人: alto [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Martin Duke 发送时间: 2021年11月18日 8:30 收件人: IETF ALTO <[email protected]> 主题: [alto] PANRG questions Hello ALTO, Please have a look at this paper in the PANRG about open research questions in path aware networking. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-panrg-questions/ In some ways this document is orthogonal to ALTO, but in others (notably 2.1 and 2.2) ALTO has at least attempted to provide a complete answer. As I've said before, a lot of proposals for future extensions to ALTO could usefully get vetted in PANRG while we complete the items in our current charter. Thanks, Martin
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
