Hi Francesca, Thanks for the review and we are sorry for the late response. Somehow it went into the spams.
We have changed the reference to RFC 7540 to draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis as suggested. Thanks for the comment! Best, Kai > -----Original Messages----- > From: "Francesca Palombini via Datatracker" <[email protected]> > Sent Time: 2021-12-02 18:00:05 (Thursday) > To: "The IESG" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > Subject: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-19: (with COMMENT) > > Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-19: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-path-vector/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work on this document. > > Many thanks to Paul Kyzivat for his review: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/S97ViLB3YGpv2ljI9xnQGLCQYgM/ , and > thanks to the authors for addressing it. > > I only had time to scan the document, but did not find any major ART issues. > One thing I noted is that the reference to RFC7540 should be replaced with a > ref to draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis/. > > Francesca > > </[email protected]></[email protected]> _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
