Greetings,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6876

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:21 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7285,
> "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6876
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mohamed BOUCADAIR <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 14.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | Identifier | Intended Semantics |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | pid        | See Section 7.1.1  |
>                    | priv:      | Private use        |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
> 
>                   Table 4: ALTO Endpoint Property Types
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | Identifier | Intended Semantics |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | pid        | See Section 7.1.1  |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
> 
>                   Table 4: ALTO Endpoint Property Types
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> priv: is not an identifier, but a prefix.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7285 (draft-ietf-alto-protocol-27)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol
> Publication Date    : September 2014
> Author(s)           : R. Alimi, Ed., R. Penno, Ed., Y. Yang, Ed., S. Kiesel, 
> S. Previdi, W. Roome, S. Shalunov, R. Woundy
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Application-Layer Traffic Optimization
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to