Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-26: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the updates from -21 through -26, and my apologies to have taken so long to review the changes! My previous discuss point about the "cur" operator of the "bw-utilized" metric is no longer relevant after the removal of that metric from this document. I also appreciate the updated examples (including Content-Length); I seem to now get values that are off by one from what's currently in the -26, but given that the authors have consciously looked into the topic and I have low confidence in my own methodology, I will drop that as a Discuss point. _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
