Hi, The headers for the affected registries now read as follows:
ALTO Cost Metrics Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review Reference: [RFC7285][RFC Errata 6874] Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private Use (see [RFC7285], Section 10.6). ALTO Endpoint Property Types Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review Reference: [RFC7285][RFC Errata 6876] Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private Use (see [RFC7285], Section 10.8.2). The "priv:" registration has been removed from each registry. thanks, Amanda Baber IANA Operations Manager On Fri May 13 20:48:24 2022, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:58:06PM +0000, Amanda Baber via RT wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This question relates to both 6874 and 6876: > > > > Should "priv:" be removed from the ALTO Cost Metrics and ALTO > > Endpoint Property Types registries? See > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/alto-protocol > > > > If so, should we add the note "Note: Identifiers prefixed with > > 'priv:' > > are reserved for Private Use (see RFC 7285, Section 10.8.2)" to the > > top of each registry? > > Please note the two different references to different sections of the > document for the two registries. > > Please add > > Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private Use > (see RFC 7285, Section 10.6) > > to the ALTO Cost Metrics registry and > > Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private Use > (see RFC 7285, Section 10.8.2) > > to the ALTO Endpoint Property Types registry. > > thanks > Sebastian _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
