Hi, regarding the statements I also want to share my view referring to:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/wg-materials/blob/main/FutureALTO/alto-direction-of-work.md Seeing the enthusiasm of our working activity I think option 3 is that what the group want. The new ideas that are currently proposed are showing this, too. Instead of moving this topic to a group being less interested or start the creation of a new WG using BOF process, it would be good to check and discuss the re-chartering with community in the IETF. The idea that if the scope is modified, that we will end-up in additional more interest and contributions is also an important argument. The proposed direction "Recharter the WG with a focus on ALTO to cover both maintenance and the new industry needs (where such needs are currently being discussed in the ALTO WG internal meetings and mailing list)" is reasonable and supported by me. Best Regards Roland _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
