Hi Tom, Many thanks for following up on this document. Sorry to miss the issues.
We have fixed them in https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang/pull/100 and will merge the changes to the next revision. Thanks, Jensen On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 7:25 PM tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > I commented on this I-D 25sep23. > > I got a response from the document shepherd which addressed two of my > points but not the others. I never got a response from an author. > > I note that -15 still has issues that I raised. Two I notice are: > > RFC9274 is in the text but not in the I-D References > 172.17.0.2 is in the examples seemingly as an IP address but I do not see > this in the list of documentation addresses > > HTH (I see that today is IESG review day!) > > Tom Petch
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
