Quoting Joi Ellis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote:
> >Paul Tomblin wrote:
> [snip]
> >> reformat?  I don't have a bulk eraser.  I tried using "mt setdensity
> >> DDS-2", but it didn't take.
> >mt weof 5
> >or
> >mt erase
> >or
> >dd if=/dev/zero bs=32k of=$TAPE
> 
> In my own experience, using only a dd won't change the tape's format.  My
> drives all see and use the original drive blocksize and compressions
> setting and use it until I overwrite it with a weof.  I don't know if
> the erase will do it or not.  I know when my drive is shoeshining on a 
> tape header, an erase won't do it.  I'm certain the dd won't...
> 
> (4mm DAT of various vintanges, EXB-8500, EXB-8505).
> 
> (Did you mean for the dd to overwrite the whole tape?  Usually just
> whacking the header is sufficient.  If not, add a count=NN to it.)

So far nothing has worked.  I've tried "mt weof 10", "mt erase" and "mt
setdensity 0x24", and nothing has worked.

-- 
Paul Tomblin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not speaking for anybody
Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware.  Hardware
has limitations, software doesn't.  It's a real shame that Turing
machines are so poor at I/O.

Reply via email to