On Nov 11, 2000, Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:25:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>> IIRC, some people have reported that it won't bump to higher-level
>> incrementals before the lower-level ones make it to tape. I.e., it
>> doesn't ``trust'' incrementals in the holding disk. IMO, it should.
> It depend of the `reserve' parameter in 2.4.1p1, it must < 100 to
> trust the dump in the holding disk.
> In 2.4.2, it always trust the dump in the holding disk, maybe we
> should use a parameter for this.
I could have sworn people have reported the behavior I describe above
against 2.4.2-beta1. But, if you say so, I believe you :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
