>anyone have an interpretation of this:
>
>"planner: isengard:/isen1/iraf mismatch: no tapelist record, but
>curinfo next_level0: 59."
I didn't poke around real hard, but it seems like Amanda tried to look
up the tape label listed in the curinfo database for the last backup
and didn't find it in your tapelist file (which might be because of the
amrmtape you did yesterday) and it notices that it's going to be a while
before the next full dump is done. It then appears to try to force a
level 0 to get things back in sync.
As you said, it sounds rather unpleasant, but is probably OK.
>Paul Yeatman
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
