>I need a tapetype definition. I'm running tapetype right now but I'm
>impatient (I've been reading stories about this possibly taking more than 5
>days.)
Those reports are probably based on the 2.4.1 version of tapetype.
The 2.4.2 version is **much** faster.
>I am using a ... 40GB/80GB DLT 8000.
Most drives of a particular type (DLT 8000 in this case), regardless
of reseller label, are going to behave close enough to the same for
your purposes. Here's a typical one:
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/189.html
>Andrew
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
