Hi!

I have been trying to do a tapeless configuration of amanda, to use holding
disk. (JRJ: If you're reading this: I couldn't find amanda-242-tapeio on
CVS that you suggested to someone else on 3/7/2001. Any more info on that?)

Anyway, back to the problem at hand - amanda 2.4.2pl1; client + server both
RedHat 6.2. A test dump resulted in this error, even tough I was trying a
full dump.

Here's a compilation of the logfile, disklist and amanda.conf - at least
the parts that I thought matter most in this case. Hope it helps.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-Shreedeep.

--------------
log.20010309.8
--------------
START planner date 20010309
INFO planner Adding new disk fbsd:/usr.
START driver date 20010309
ERROR taper no-tape [no tape online]
FINISH planner date 20010309
STATS driver startup time 1.655
FAIL driver fbsd /usr 0 [can't switch to incremental dump]
FINISH driver date 20010309 time 1.711
--------------
disklist
--------------
# sample Amanda2 disklist file, derived from CS.UMD.EDU's disklist
#

fbsd /usr always-full-s le0
--------------
amanda.conf
--------------
...
tapedev "/dev/doesntexist"    # the no-rewind tape device to be used; for
                        # TAPELESS config - using a nonexistant tape drive.
...
holdingdisk hd1 {
    comment "main holding disk"
    directory "/opt"    # where the holding disk is
    use 35 Gb           # how much space can we use on it
                        # a non-positive value means:
                        #        use all space but that value
    chunksize 0         # size of chunk if you want big dump to be
                        # dumped on multiple files on holding disks
                        #  N Kb/Mb/Gb split images in chunks of size N
                        #             The maximum value should be
                        #             (MAX_FILE_SIZE - 1Mb)
                        #  0          same as INT_MAX bytes
    }
...
define dumptype always-full-s {
    global
    comment "Full dump of this filesystem always"
# -s for server-side compression
    compress server best
    priority high
    dumpcycle 0
}
____________

Reply via email to