"John R. Jackson" wrote:
> >Using "dumpcycle 0" I still see incrementals in the archive backup.
>
> Really? Under what circumstances? This is usually all I do to get an
> archive such as you're trying to do.
I've seen it happen when planner thinks the tape is full, and it
decides to switch to incrementals for some of the disks. It warns
you then with a "planner: Dump too big for tape: full dump of ... delayed".
(It seems indeed the best thing it can do given the constraints of
a overflowing tape and the order to keep as much as it can.)
--
Paul Bijnens, Lant Tel +32 16 40.51.40
Interleuvenlaan 15 H, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM Fax +32 16 40.49.61
http://www.lant.com/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now: exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt, abort, hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e, kill -1 $$, shutdown, *
* kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ... *
* ... "Are you sure?" ... YES ... Phew ... I'm out *
***********************************************************************
