On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 at 9:35am, Jason Brooks wrote > I have finalized on "18432 mbytes" because that seems to be a reasonable > amount of data to expect to go on one tape. My question: is this the > appropriate use of "tapetype", or should I be modifying a different > variable? > You've got it right -- using hardware compression requires you to "lie" to amanda (via the tapetype definition) about the size of your tapes.
-- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
