Hi folks.

I just got through a day and a half of trying to find out why I 
couldn't do a backup, this after installing 2.4.3b2 over my 
2.4.2p2++++ install about the 3rd of Jan 2002.

amcheck and df both kept saying my 40g drive was full, when the 
last time I checked it a week or so back it  was sitting at 14% 
full.  That was my clue that it probably was just one totally 
humungous file someplace, the question was where on a 40g drive?

I wrote several one liners based on tree, and ls -lR, trying to 
see if it was amanda related, but it turns out I had to go 
looking by hand to find the drive space filler.

I don't recall if I had noted the 'configdir/tapestatus' file as 
ever being anything but a zero length file before, but when I did 
an ls -l in the /usr/local/etc/amanda directory, it stuck out 
like a very long, badly swollen sore thumb as it had blown itself 
up to 30,367,168,256 bytes, aka 30 gigabytes!

Humm, it was in one of the outputs of my searchs, here

-rw-r--r--    1 amanda   amanda   30307168256 Jan  8 08:30 \ 
tapestatus (darned kmail, wraps lines)

It took rm -f about 3 minutes to delete it, and the drive is now 
back to 18% full, so I'm a much happier camper that I was 10 
hours ago when I gave up and went to work.

I had been fooling around, trying to make the "emubarcode" option 
work, but gave up as it, even if defined but = 0, gave me 
database format errors, so apparently thats not an option one can 
turn on and off at will.  I relate this as it may have something 
to do with a 30 gigabyte tapestatus file.

But I will let the resident experts digest this one, and tell me 
if its safe to continue before I remove the #'s from the first 
character position of each amanda related line in my crontab.

Trying to recover from a full drive when even e2fsck can't do 
anything but puke all over itself when it runs into a file that 
size isn't exactly my cup of tea.  While the filesystem may now 
handle files into the petabyte range as of kernel-2.4.13-8, I 
don't recall seeing anything about e2fsck also being so blessed.  
Can someone clarify that please?

-- 
Cheers, gene

Reply via email to