Brandon
err you mention the le0 interface in the config.
Is this correct 'cos the the le0 interface is a 10base system, not
100base!..
--
Martin
Brandon Moro wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I am having some troubles with my AMANDA backups running too long. They
> often take 20+ hours,
> sometimes even breaking the 24-hour mark. The average amount of data I get
> is only about 35GB.
>
> I am running my amanda-server on Solaris8, on a Sun Ultra5 400MHz with 256MB
> RAM, on a 100mbps
> connection. I have 2 DLT 7000 tape drives set up (though it very rarely
> roles over).
>
> Recently, I put a larger holding disk on the server and found that my run
> time was cut more than in half!
> However, I notice that I am still only getting a total of about 3GB an hour.
> The data runs from the holding
> disk to tape at more like 6MB/s.
>
> We have a couple of other backup systems running on almost identical
> hardware that puts more than
> twice as much data to tape in slightly less time. So I guess what I am
> really asking is, am I missing
> something in the configuration of AMANDA sthat will allow better usage of
> the network connection?
>
> I found this in the amanda.conf file:
>
> netusage 4000 Kbps # maximum net bandwidth for Amanda, in KB per sec
> (blah blah)
>
> network interfaces
>
> ..... Attributes are:
> use - bandwidth above which amanda won't
> start
> backups using this interface.
> Note that if
> a single backup will take more
> than that,
> amanda won't try to make it run
> slower!
>
> define interface local {
> comment "a local disk"
> use 1000 kbps
> }
>
> define interface le0 {
> comment "100 Mbps ethernet"
> use 4000 kbps
>
>
> So, does this mean that if my dumpers are using 4000kbps, amanda won't allow
> any more
> dumpers to start (even if the maximum number of allowed dumpers has not been
> reached)?
>
> Can I improve performance by raising the netusage variable and "use"
> attribute to something
> more in line with the actual capacity of the amanda-server's network
> connection?
>
> Also, the network interface on the amanda-server is actually "hme0". Are
> the above simply
> examples? Should I create a new interface definition?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Brandon Moro
> Systems Administration, Unify Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------
>>From meanness first this Portsmouth Yankey rose, And still to meanness all
> his conduct flows. --Oppression, A poem by an American (Boston, 1765).
>
>
>
