On Monday 25 March 2002 12:38 am, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 10:12:43PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 24 March 2002 05:16 pm, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
>> >On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 10:06:41PM +0100, Thomas Hepper wrote:
>> >> Yup there was an bug introduced in chg-scsi which will
>> >> cause an endless loop on readingthe config file, fixed in
>> >> CVS so wait for the next snapshot.
>> >
>> >A new snapshot is already available.
>> >
>> >Jean-Louis
>>
>> I just grabbed it again at 21:00 my time, making note that the
>> tar.gz was exactly the same size, and its still broken.  I
>> think it is your site I'm getting my snapshots from.
>>
>> <http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~martinea/amanda-2.4.3b3-20020324
>>.tar.gz>
>
>It's 
> <http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~martinea/amanda/amanda-2.4.3b3-20
>020324.tar.gz>
>
>No more up to date site.
>
>I build a snapshot every time someone commit something on CVS, I
> don't know if it compile. I don't know if your bug is fixed.
>
>Latest snapshot have:
>> md5sum amanda-2.4.3b3-20020324.tar.gz
>
>f74bc9822c6cf1d8624819cac6fbff16  amanda-2.4.3b3-20020324.tar.gz

Now I don't know, Jean-Louis.  I'd rm'd both the build directory 
and the archive before going after it again last nite, but I get

ae9f2fea5b79cde0357506728b01f93d

for the md5sum of what I got for the 3rd time last night.  It 
still has a time of just after 1800 the 24th.

>Maybe you have a caching problem.

Possibly, but I don't /think/ its me, no copy existed on either 
of my machines at the time of the last download.  I'll just wait 
till the next snapshot, this is not that big a deal except for 
those users of chg-scsi, and the 20020311 version seems to be 
chugging right along, no problems other than it overran the first 
tape last night and had to use most (3.5g) of the second tape 
too.  It was odd, and was the first time it has done that but it 
worked ok according to the email it sent me.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
98.7+% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a hillbilly

Reply via email to