"John R. Jackson" wrote: > >... Is there anyway, to get Amanda to work without > >opening ports on the firewall? ... > > Probably not now. The SECURITY-API work in 2.5 should provide the > framework for supporting other transport mechanisms, but it will take > someone to do the coding. Any volunteers? > > >I have read the FAQs on the Amanda site, and I don't understand why there > >has to be a range of UDP ports open. ... > > Grab a copy of 2.4.3 beta from the web site and look at docs/PORT.USAGE. > I tried to describe what is currently going on, and maybe that will help. > Actually, if it doesn't, let me know and I'll update the doc.
I wondered for a while there whether the word firewall in the subject of a message caused the mailing list software to filter it out... ;-) Did you see my earlier question about connection tracking? I'd really like to get it working. Would another list (e.g. amanda developers or whatever it's called) be a more appropriate place to ask the questions? Paul http://paulgear.webhop.net
