>Is "gdbm" support just broken in this release? ... I'm sure that's the case.
>Has anyone found a solution to this problem? As I said, if you can get by without out, that's probably the way to go. If you can't, then I'll take a look when I get back from a conference next week (or someone else can take a shot at it in between). I'm sure it's just some header file magic that has to be dealt with. >Marc Davignon John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
