> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 at 1:38pm, Toralf Lund wrote
> 
> > I want my data to be backed up once a week, and the dump process to run
> on
> > weekdays only, so I've specified
> >
> > dumpcycle 1 week
> >
> > and
> >
> > runspercycle 5
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> > Also, I'm not interested in incremental backups right now, so I'm using
> 
> > "skip-incr" in the dumptype definitions.
> 
> Err, ok.  But this leaves you open to the possibility of losing a week's
> worth of changes to your filesystems.  Any particular reason you want to
> skip incrementals?
We have a separate system for incremental backups. I may decide to 
discontinue that later, but I prefer to take this one step at a time, and 
set up a *simple* amanda config at first.

> > That's fine in many causes, but what happens if the size of some of the
> 
> > filesystems that were dumped on Monday of the first week has been
> reduced?
[ ... ]

> 
> Amanda *will* promote dumps (aka do a level 0 ahead of schedule) if
> there's tape space.
Glad to hear that. I guess I must have misinterpreted the log info...

> Note that amanda tries to use approximately the same
> 
> amount of tape each run, not necessarily the maximum amount of tape.
Doesn't make much sense to me...


> Amanda is also good at recovering from "bad" backups.
Possibly, but it's really pretty bad at handling full tapes, I'd say. I 
see the lack of ability to split a directory across several tapes as the 
one major drawback of Amanda. Also, as long as this functionality isn't 
there, shouldn't it at least try to rewind and fill the tape with 
something else when an overflow occurs?

> 
> I'm a little confused, I must admit.  At one point you say that you want
> amanda to do dumps early if there's tape space, but then you say that you
> 
> don't want the same data backed up twice in the same week.  What exactly
> are you trying to accomplish?
I want to write as much data as possible to each tape. Isn't that obvious?

It's not like I have to use all tapes. If I could complete the cycle in 
less than 5 days, I'd be very happy indeed.

- Toralf

Reply via email to