On Wed, 29 May 2002 at 9:02am, Bradley Marshall wrote > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 08:11:27AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > > Why not define a slightly smaller tapelength? That way amanda won't try > > to put too much on the tape. > > > > Are you using hardware compression? You may be assuming too much > > compression. > > I'm actually using software compression for some reason. I'll drop > down the tapelength and see how that goes.
How much are you getting on tape, and how much do you expect to get on tape? You can tell how much successfully made it to tape by looking at the "taper:" line in the NOTES section of the amanda report. If the value is a lot smaller than you expect it to be, there may be other issues. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
