[re-listed from amanda-hackers]

>Chris,
>
>This might be more appropriate for amanda-users, but I'll give it a go:
>
>I don't see how a code change will help your hardware, and there are enough
>people on the lists on low- or no-budget networks that I won't suggest a new
>tape drive (yet). (Aside: clean the drive if you haven't lately, this sounds
>like dirty heads.)
>
>After each backup, I would suggest using amverify to determine if the tape
>is any good, then removing and re-labeling the tape if amverify fails. You
>said this 'doesn't appeal', but I think its cleanest when you've destroyed a
>good(?) backup on that media with a bad one. You need to get rid of the
>indexes for the tape regardless of what you do with the physical media.
>
>If you write a script to amverify/amrmtape/amlabel, you could make it log
>the re-labels to look for a pattern, such as a specific brand of tape
>causing the problem.


Does anyone have such a script to share? that is a:

   "script to amverify/amrmtape/amlabel"



>
>I would also be VERY suspicious of the 'good' backups on a drive that is
>sometimes 'bad'. If the data's that important, then a reliable backup drive
>should be equally important.
>
>Best of luck,
>Paul
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:23 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: ...but I didn't use that tape!
>>
>>
>> I have a lousy tape drive.  When I try to dump (or flush),
>> sometimes the
>> backups will fail on the first file (after the label) on the
>> tape.  In
>> other words, there's no valid backup data on the tape.  But Amanda
>> considers the tape to be used, and I can't put more data on
>> it unless I
>> either wait for the tape cycle to come around again, re-label
>> the tape
>> in question, or try and hack on the datafiles.  For various reasons,
>> none of these options really appeals to me.
>>
>> Would it be desirable to special-case this situation?  If a
>> tape write
>> fails before the first file has been completely written,
>> don't consider
>> the tape to have been used.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Chris Jones                                       Mad
>> scientist at large
>>    www.netbsd.org www.postgresql.org www.schemers.org www.python.org
>>

Reply via email to