On Jue 20 Jun 2002 17:17, Ragnar Kj�rstad wrote:
>
>
> This issue has been discussed in depth on the reiserfs and reiserfs-dev
> lists; I propse you subscribe or browse the archives for more
> information. In particular there is a thread about filesystem-features
> required for mailservers, and there is a post from Wietse where he
> writes:
>
> "ext2fs isn't a great file system for mail. Queue files are short-lived,
> so mail delivery involves are a lot of directory operations. ext2fs
> has ASYNCHRONOUS DIRECTORY updates and can lose a file even when
> fsync() on the file succeeds."
Sorry, but I think Wietse was talking about ext3, not ext2.
ext3 has asyncronous updates, as it's a journal FS. Not an expert on FS, but I
read Wietse's mail on the Postfix mailling list.
--
Porqu� usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si pod�s usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mart�n Marqu�s | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
