yes - that's right. the slow part is your computer compressing the data. The "offline" message is a "yet to be crafted" question for this list - amanda isn't backing up the reiserfs partition on one of the machines. The drive is a SDLT110, there are 3 servers, and a dedicated 40G holding disk. After setting it up this way, the performance of amanda skyrocketed (by having a dedicated holding disk, fast backup drive, one server getting multiple clients to do client-side compression).
Cheers, Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------ These dumps were to tape Loyalty003. The next tape Amanda expects to use is: Loyalty004. FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: diablo /dev/hde1 lev 0 FAILED [disk /dev/hde1 offline on diablo?] STATISTICS: Total Full Daily -------- -------- -------- Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:04 Run Time (hrs:min) 6:51 Dump Time (hrs:min) 9:09 8:47 0:22 Output Size (meg) 19111.8 16576.7 2535.1 Original Size (meg) 35566.2 31388.3 4177.9 Avg Compressed Size (%) 53.7 52.8 60.7 (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Dumped 12 11 1 (1:1) Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 594.5 536.8 1994.5 Tape Time (hrs:min) 0:34 0:30 0:04 Tape Size (meg) 19112.2 16577.1 2535.2 Tape Used (%) 18.6 16.1 2.5 (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Taped 12 11 1 (1:1) Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 9584.5 9556.1 9775.1 NOTES: planner: Adding new disk diablo:/dev/hde1. planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda5 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sdc1 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sda4 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda6 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sdb1 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sda3 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda3 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda1 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sda1 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of diablo:/dev/hda3 promoted from 1 day ahead. planner: Full dump of diablo:/dev/hda1 promoted from 1 day ahead. taper: tape Loyalty003 kb 19570912 fm 12 [OK] DUMP SUMMARY: DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s -------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------ bob /dev/sda1 0 1636282 490848 30.0 32:19 253.1 0:558997.6 bob /dev/sda3 0 132318 27328 20.7 2:36 175.3 0:0216471.5 bob /dev/sda4 0 1241536 786336 63.3 6:302016.4 1:219731.9 bob /dev/sdb1 0 1157677 577760 49.9 22:47 422.6 1:019507.0 bob /dev/sdc1 0 79762334850560 60.8 39:502029.8 8:139831.1 bob /dev/sdd1 1 42781942595968 60.7 21:421994.5 4:269775.0 diablo /dev/hda1 0 2113691 919424 43.5 30:23 504.4 1:438910.0 diablo /dev/hda3 0 30202 4672 15.5 0:17 269.1 0:014178.1 diablo /dev/hde1 0 FAILED --------------------------------------- gemini /dev/sda1 0 1717516 557536 32.5 123:15 75.4 1:088226.4 gemini /dev/sda3 0 953407 280096 29.4 27:42 168.5 0:446435.9 gemini /dev/sda5 0 139187958458624 60.8 211:53 665.4 14:239803.3 gemini /dev/sda6 0 1263950 21376 1.7 29:29 12.1 0:073192.7 (brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.2p2) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of greg Sent: Friday, 6 September 2002 08:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: statistics Does this look right? STATISTICS: Total Full Daily -------- -------- -------- Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:06 Run Time (hrs:min) 11:48 Dump Time (hrs:min) 11:42 11:42 0:01 Output Size (meg) 24171.4 24171.4 0.0 Original Size (meg) 54320.4 54318.3 2.1 Avg Compressed Size (%) 44.5 44.5 1.5 (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Dumped 3 2 1 (1:1) Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 587.4 588.0 0.8 Tape Time (hrs:min) 11:41 11:41 0:00 Tape Size (meg) 24171.5 24171.5 0.1 Tape Used (%) 64.5 64.5 0.0 (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Taped 3 2 1 (1:1) Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 588.5 588.5 29.3 It is saying it took 11 hrs to dump 54GB or 24GB compressed. I have a quantum DLT8000-40 which is rated at 6MB/s or 12MB/s compressed. 11hrs seems a long time even considering gzip as the software compression. Is there something I am missing here? -greg
