On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 at 8:57am, Orion Poplawski wrote > On Friday 01 November 2002 08:37 am, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> > Not necessarily. You can find out exactly what configure options were > > used by looking in /tmp/amanda/amandad*debug. Note that the runtar > > executable needs to be owned by root and setuid (as do several other > > programs -- this is done properly when you do 'make install' as root). > > Here's the top of amandad*debug, but I'm not user what tells me how it was Oops. Apparently that's 2.4.3 specific. But, yes, it appears that CLIENT_LOGIN is the same as --with-user=. Compiling for root is generally Bad. > compiled (CLIENT_LOGIN?). Also, runtar is setuid root (and most of the > progs in /libexec), so I'm not sure why the complaint about having to run as > root. What does your inetd entry look like? -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
